As I said before my friend Ted is the only one I know that watches the whole Academy Awards from start to finish. I always look forward to his synopsis of the show. It ALMOST makes me want to watch it next year.
Here is Ted's wrap-up...
I watched the first half of the Oscars on Sunday night and decided if I stayed up any longer they would be getting to the good part and I'd be up too late. I was really impressed with Anne Hathaway. I mean, yes, she is really pretty (though sometimes her mouth just seems freakishly large), but I thought she was enthusiastic, professional, and comfortable. I'm not sure why she sang a song, but she did a great job. James Franco just seems like the stoner that he always plays, but he did alright. He said afterwards that he was going to school during the week (he’s getting a Ph.D in English at Yale) and could only get ready for the Oscars on weekends, a lot of which was probably dedicated to doing the pre-recorded bits. So really he should have turned it down. I thought the opening montage where they go into people’s dreams was pretty funny, but I don’t know why they had Back to the Future in there.
Other than that, I have the usual complaints. Too many technical awards and acceptance speeches. The short subjects shouldn't be part of the ceremony because nobody sees them. I wouldn't mind seeing a two-part Oscars where they show the short subjects on Saturday and give the award at the end. 20 minutes times 5 nominees times 2 short subject awards is 200 minutes though. And while I don't want to hear some crazy Belgian short documentary maker thank all of his friends, I also don't think it is fair that they get like 10 seconds to make a speech while the actors get as much time as they want apparently. Even the winner of best animated feature only got 10 seconds. More people probably see the animated features than any other category!
I felt bad for Kirk Douglas. I think it's great that he is able to do all of that after having a stroke, and he was pretty funny, but it's painful to watch and he was hard to understand. I enjoyed him teasing the supporting actresses after opening the envelope. Most people don't have the guts to do that, but as a two-time loser, he earned the right.
I saw so few movies last year that I couldn't possibly have an opinion on who should win pretty much anything. I like Aaron Sorkin (who wrote The West Wing TV series and A Few Good Men), so I was glad he got an Oscar for writing The Social Network. And now I want to see The Fighter to see what that was all about. The King's Speech, Inception, The Kids are All Right, The Black Swan, The Fighter, and The Social Network are all on my list.
After watching the good half of the Oscars the next day, I don’t have many further comments, though I liked Randy Newman's acceptance speech and thought Natalie Portman must be incredibly smart because she remembered everyone who helped make her movie and thanked them by name without looking at notes. Last year I thought the speeches saying how wonderful each actress is were over the top. I still thought it was unnecessary, but it wasn't quite as ooey and gooey this year. And after Jeff Bridges said all those nice things, Sandra Bullock was kind of mean to the men. But given what’s happened to her since the last Oscars, I guess she has earned that too.
Maybe the nominees could submit thank you lists in advance and those could crawl across the bottom of the screen as people give their speeches. I’m sure it is nice to be thanked by an Oscar winner, but I don’t know the people they are thanking usually. But I guess there isn’t much more to say. You don’t want to write a nice speech and then lose and not get to use it.